“You can observe a lot by watching.”
― Yogi Berra (one of his catchphrases)
Redundancies: Tautologies and Pleonasms
When it comes to redundancy in writing, linguists differentiate between tautological and pleonastic redundancies. Although both terms refer to faulty stylistic repetitiveness, there is a slight difference in their uses, which I explain here. Although the terms are not always consistently applied in literature, I find them helpful in revealing the curious differences between the linguistic redundancies:
➤ Generally, tautology refers to the repetition of the same word or phrase through rephrasing, or the repetitiveness in the immediate context of the same idea or statement through duplication in meaning (tautological duplication).
For example, the question “Can you please repeat it again?” is technically tautological, since the adverbial “again” duplicates the meaning already expressed by the verb “repeat”. Or when we often combine the adjective and adverbial that have similar meanings in such expressions as, “The main factors that trigger anxiety in us generally include ...” Other tautological duplications may include phrasal verbs (fall down, drop down, lift up, follow after, lag behind), the so-called hyponym compounds, or appositive bare-noun compounds, with the second noun conveying a set of which the first noun is a member (emergency situation, cash money, cameo appearance), other longer expressions (for the next discussion later on, as it has been previously found), etc.
In Turkish, the common tautological duplication may occur when the adverbial beraber (together) is combined with ile (with) and/or with a verb with the reciprocal suffix -ış, which already implies reciprocity, as in the sentences below:
Kızım, bu kitap ile beraber bütün seriyi okumuş oldu. Kızım, bu kitapla, bütün seriyi okumuş oldu. My daughter has read all of the books in this series. | Oysaki bu dünyayı bu canlılarla birlikte paylaşıyoruz. Oysaki bu dünyayı bu canlılarla paylaşıyoruz. We share the Earth with all these creatures. |
➤ A pleonasm is a particular case of tautological duplication, and it usually refers to the use of an extraneous modifier with a head that already implies the meaning conveyed by the modifier.
We are surrounded by pleonastic expressions in our daily lives. For example, we don't stop to wonder why we say a face mask (yüz maskesi) and not just a mask, even though we use the word mask only in relation to our faces. Likewise, a bouquet of flowers (çiçek buketi), natural instinct (doğal içgüdü), empty space (boş alan), or annual anniversary (yıllık yıldönümü) are all technically redundant phrases, just as are the phrases “to ask a question” (soru sormak), “for a brief moment” (kısa bir an), or “to book in advance” (önceden rezervasyon yaptırmak).
In English, pleonastic modifications may include noun phrases with somewhat redundant adjectives (modifiers) (e.g., final ultimatum, brief summary, personal friend, empty hole, general public, future plans), some nominal compounds (e.g., biography of life, bouquet of flowers), and verb phrases (grow in size, compete with each other, gather together, estimate at about, evolve over time, fly in the air, circle around, introduce for the first time).
Unintentional and Intentional Redundancies
A faulty style is not considered a grammatical error. Nevertheless, it can provoke mockery and ridiculing and cause more embarrassment than a misspelled word, a misordered sentence, or a misapplied comma. What makes matters even more confusing is that, while some stylistic redundancies may cause us to have a mild seizure, others leave us cold or go unnoticed. As it happens, we use and encounter many repetitive (and redundant) expressions in our conversations and writings, often for a good reason.
Many commonplace redundant expressions seem to be rooted in our fear of misunderstanding. After all, linguistic communication is often hampered by noises, dialectical differences, lacking attention, and misinterpretation, so it’s not surprising that languages have developed some degree of redundancy as an “insurance policy,” having a number of commonplace, unintentional, and acceptable redundancies.
Other, “innocent,” redundancies may be explained by our somewhat understandable impulse to add variation to, and prolong, some commonly used expressions. It may feel somehow natural to say or write, for example, that “there are various kinds/types of something”, even though the modifier various shares its stem with the noun ‘variety’, a synonym of ‘kind’ or ‘type’. (So, we are basically saying, “there are varieties of kinds/types of something”.)
Not all redundancies are innocent, however. Some, for instance, are intentionally concocted by the machinery of obfuscating enticement churned by marketeers and “mad” admen. Regularly bombarded by the messages and imagery targeting our basic human emotions, we eventually stop noticing such otherwise obvious redundancies as extra bonus, free gifts, or the biggest hits. Therefore, once in a while, it is important to re-examine anything taken for granted to dust up one's preconceptions with mental clarity and precise articulation.
🎭😆 Pleonastic and tautological expressions are often subtle and paradoxical, playing with words and expectations. Pleonasms and tautologies may be a fertile source of witticisms, with the best of them managing to be “caught in the popular fancy”, as aptly described by Sheridan Baker in The Practical Stylist, and become catchphrases. Some of such catchphrases are attributed to Yogi Berra, an American professional baseball player, and, by all accounts, a very witty man. His laconic, clever jokes were often tautological and paradoxical, like truths “in a hurry”, as Berra’s biographer described them. They became popularly known as “Yogi-isms”. Here are some of them:
“It ain't over ’til it's over.” 👏
“The future ain't what it used to be.” 😜
“It’s deja vu all over again.” 👍
“You can observe a lot by watching.” 😋
“Predictions are hard, especially about the future.” 🤘
Tautological Duplication in Meaning
The word ‘tautology’ is a compound of two words, tauto- (“the same”) and -logos (“saying”), used in Latin as tautologia (“representation of the same thing in other words”) and in Greek as tautologos (“repeating what has been said”).
Tautologies may be lexical (repeated vocabulary), semantic (duplicated meaning), or grammatical (repetitive syntax). One of these expressions is usually redundant and can be removed. And when it comes to stylistic usage, when something can be safely removed (that is, without affecting the meaning or the emotion intended to be conveyed), then it is probably redundant!
yani ... daha açıkçası OR yani ... daha açıkçası
Romanlar mahzun insanı omuzları çökmüş, gözleri sönmüş, hareketsiz ve sessiz bir insan diye, yani daha açıkçası bir miskin şeklinde tasvir ederler.
Reşat Nuri Güntekin, Çalıkuşu
Revised 1:
Romanlar mahzun insanı omuzları çökmüş, gözleri sönmüş, hareketsiz ve sessiz bir insan diye, yani bir miskin şeklinde tasvir ederler.
Novels portray sad people as motionless and quiet, with their shoulders slumped, their eyes extinguished—that is, as slugs.
Revised 2:
Romanlar mahzun insanı omuzları çökmüş, gözleri sönmüş, hareketsiz ve sessiz bir insan diye, daha açıkçası bir miskin şeklinde tasvir ederler.
Novels portray sad people as motionless and quiet, with their shoulders slumped, their eyes extinguished—in other words, as slugs.
anlamı ... demektir OR anlamı ... demektir
Bu sözün esas anlamı “demet, deste” demektir.
Zülfikar (from Necmiye Alpay's Türkçe Sorunları Kılavuzu)
Revised 1:
Bu sözün esas anlamı “demet, deste”dir.
The principal meaning of this word is “bundle, bunch.”
Revised 2:
Bu söz, “demet, deste” demektir.
This word means “bundle, bunch.”
mecburen ... zorunda kalmak OR mecburen ... zorunda kalmak
Mecburen karakola gitmek zorunda kaldım.
Revised 1:
Karakola gitmek zorunda kaldım.
I had to go to the police station.
Revised 2:
Mecburen karakola gittim.
Inevitably, I went to the police station.
Another common redundancy occurs when there are two adverbial modifiers that mean the same thing:
başlıca ... genellikle OR başlıca ... genellikle
Çocuklarda kaygıyı tetikleyen başlıca faktörler arasında genellikle genetik yatkınlık, stresli yaşam olayları, aile dinamikleri ve sosyal baskılar yer almaktadır.
(lit. The main factors that trigger anxiety in children generally include genetic predisposition, stressful life events, family dynamics, and social pressures.)
Revised 1:
Çocuklarda kaygıyı tetikleyen başlıca faktörler arasında genetik yatkınlık, stresli yaşam olayları, aile dinamikleri ve sosyal baskılar yer almaktadır.
The main factors that trigger anxiety in children include genetic predisposition, stressful life events, family dynamics, and social pressures.
Revised 2:
Çocuklarda kaygıyı tetikleyen faktörler arasında genellikle genetik yatkınlık, stresli yaşam olayları, aile dinamikleri ve sosyal baskılar yer almaktadır.
The factors that trigger anxiety in children generally include genetic predisposition, stressful life events, family dynamics, and social pressures.
Below is a very common example of a grammatical tautology, namely, a tautological fusion of two grammatical forms that mean the same thing:
bu sebepten dolayı OR bu sebepten dolayı (bundan dolayı)
Bu sebepten dolayı, vize başvurunuzu, I-20 belgenizi alır almaz yapmanızı öneriyoruz.
Revised 1:
Bu sebepten, vize başvurunuzu, I-20 belgenizi alır almaz yapmanızı öneriyoruz.
For this reason, we recommend that you apply for a visa as soon as you receive your I-20.
Revised 2:
Bundan dolayı, vize başvurunuzu, I-20 belgenizi alır almaz yapmanızı öneriyoruz.
Therefore, we recommend that you apply for a visa as soon as you receive your I-20.
sıkıntı ... sorun OR sıkıntı ... sorun
Sıkıntı yaşadığınız en büyük sorun nedir?
Revised 1:
Yaşadığınız en büyük sıkıntı nedir?
What is your biggest concern?
Revised 2:
Yaşadığınız en büyük sorun nedir?
What is your biggest problem?
sorun ... mesele ... ⟶ sorun
Ama eğer sorun, Kürtlerin hiçbir surette hiçbir hakka sahip olamayacağı meselesi ise, o ayrı.
Revised:
Ama eğer sorun, Kürtlerin hiçbir surette hiçbir hakka olmayacağı ise, o ayrı.
But if the issue is that the Kurds will have no rights whatsoever, that's different.
ile ... beraber ⟶ ile
Viski ile beraber Halit Bey de bize iltihak etti.
Ahmed Hamdi Tanpınar, Saatleri Ayarlama Enstitüsü
Revised:
Viski ile Halit Bey de bize iltihak etti.
With a tumbler of whiskey already in his hand, Halit joined us.
ve ... hatta ⟶ hatta
Genç adam, Seniha ile beraber iki ve hatta üç kadının bir arada idaresini o kadar müşkül bulmuyordu; onun belini büken şey, asıl kumardı.
The young man could handle not only Seniha, but one more, even two more, women. What got him down was gambling.
Yakup Kadri Karaosmanoğlu, Kiralık Konak
Revised:
Genç adam, Seniha ile iki, hatta üç kadının bir arada idaresini o kadar müşkül bulmuyordu; belini asıl büken şey, kumardı.
📍Duplication is acceptable, however, when it's used for an emphatic effect:
ve ... bir de ...
Er ya da geç buluşmak vardı kaderimizde. Onu bulduğumda o derin, ela gözlerin neden öylesine mahzun baktığını öğrenecektim ve tabii bir de hazan mevsiminde bir gece yarısı nasıl öldürüleceğimi.
We were destined to meet sooner or later. At the meeting, I had to find out why those deep hazel eyes looked so sad, and, of course, how I would be killed at some autumn midnight.
Elif Şafak, Aşk
Pleonastic Modifiers as a ‘Padding’ Device
A variation of tautology is pleonasm (from Greek pleonasmos “to be more than enough, to be superfluous,” “to add superfluously”), which tends to refer to a redundant modifier used with a word whose definition already implies the property expressed by such modifier. Pleonastic expressions, or pleonastic phrases, may be acceptable if its purpose is rhetorical, which is to amplify or to intensify the meaning.
One of the prevalent usage issues in Turkish is the excessive, redundant use of deverbelized verbal modifiers, due to their chameleonic ability to take the form of any other lexical constituents, including nouns, adjectives, and adverbials.
Because nouns are what we name things around us and how we refer to things in general, they often encode in their names their own descriptions, or definitions. For example, by definition, a life is something that is being lived; a secret is hidden, a scream is loud; or a whisper is quiet, etc. Nevertheless, we often emphatically overmodify these words in conversations, and even in writing. Although the ed-participle lived may be redundant in the lived life, it is perfectly fine in the well-lived life. Likewise, a hidden secret would normally be pleonastic, unless it's emphasized or otherwise contrasted with an open secret: e.g., The abuse quickly shifted from the hidden to the open secret.
In Turkish, pleonastic expressions are often created using Turkish verbal-participles (‑an, ‑dığı, ‑mış) or converbs (‑a, ‑ken, ‑arak, ‑dikçe), which owe their prevalence to the process of nominalization (or deverbalization). Any nonfinal verb in a sentence becomes subjected to nominalization. Some modifying verbals rarely add anything substantial to the meaning of the constituents they modify, such as are such as yapılan, bulunan, denilen, sağlanan, they are tempting and easy to insert into existing sentences, especially if one feels that the sentence is too short and needs some “padding”:
ortak tarihi birlikte paylaşıyoruz ⟶ tarihi paylaşıyoruz
Yüzlerce yıllık ortak tarihi birlikte paylaşıyoruz.
(lit. We share in common hundreds of years of history together.)
Revised:
Yüzlerce yıllık tarihi paylaşıyoruz.
aradan geçen 2 günün ardından ⟶ 2 günün ardından
Aradan geçen 2 günün ardından aynı güzergâhta Osman Taş (19) adlı gence araç çarptı.
Revised:
İki günün ardından aynı güzergâhta Osman Taş (19) adlı gence araç çarptı.
Two days later, a young man named Osman Taş (19) was hit by a vehicle on the same route.
yapılan laboratuar çalışmaları ⟶ laboratuar çalışmaları
Türk alfabesinin harflerinden ğ, dilde (özellikle yazı dilinde) önemli işlevi olsa da, yapılan laboratuar çalışmalarına göre, bir sesbirimini karşılamaz.
Türk Dili, Yazılı ve Sözlü Anlatım, ed. Nurettin Demir and Emine Yılmaz
Revised:
Türk alfabesinin harflerinden ğ, dilde (özellikle yazı dilinde) önemli işlevi olsa da, laboratuar çalışmalarına göre, bir sesbirimini karşılama.
Although, according to laboratory studies, the letter ğ of the Turkish alphabet has an important function in the language (especially in writing), it does not constitute a phoneme.
yazılan biyografik romanlar ⟶ biyografik romanlar
Edebiyatımızda yazılan biyografik romanlar genelde kendini gerçekleştirmeyi başarmış insanları konu alır.
Çağdaş Türk Romanı, ed. Yakup Çelik, Emine Kolaç
Revised:
Edebiyatımızda, biyografik romanlar genelde kendini gerçekleştirmeyi başarmış insanları konu alır.
In our literature, biographical novels generally focus on people who have succeeded in self-actualization.
son yazdığı roman ⟶ son roman
Son yazdığı romanına isim bulmakta bir hayli zorlanmış.
Revised:
Son romanına isim bulmakta bir hayli zorlanmış.
He had a hard time naming his latest novel.
The verbal used in the sentence is not only redundant, it's also not quite logical:
romanlardan yapılan alıntılar ⟶ romanlardan alıntılar
Romanlardan yapılan alıntılarda üvey annelerin çocuklar tarafından pek sevilmediği görülmüştür.
Revised:
Romanlardan alınan alıntılarda üvey annelerin çocuklar tarafından pek sevilmediği görülmüştür.
Romanlardan alıntılarda üvey annelerin çocuklar tarafından pek sevilmediği görülmüştür.
The excerpts from the novels reveal that children tend to dislike their stepmothers.
Türk Kadın Yazarların Romanları
alçak sesle fısıldadı ⟶ fısıldadı
Kulağına, eğilerek alçak sesle bir şeyler fısıldadı.
Revised:
Kulağına, eğilerek bir şeyler fısıldadı.
She leaned in and whispered something in his ear.
ilk tanışmamız ⟶ tanışmamız
Onunla ilk tanışmamızı unutamam.
Revised:
Onunla tanışmamızı unutamam.
I will never forget the first time we met.*
*Note the English translation of the verb tanışmak and the use of the adverbial modifier “the first time,” since to meet can mean buluşmak, as well as tanışmak.
The reciprocal verbs may have redundant adverbial modifiers that also imply reciprocity, such as beraber (together) or aralarında (among them), as shown in the sentence below:
Seniha ile beraber ⟶ Seniha ile
Genç adam, Seniha ile beraber iki ve hatta üç kadının bir arada idaresini o kadar müşkül bulmuyordu; onun belini büken şey, asıl kumardı.
The young man could handle not only Seniha, but one more, even two more, women. What got him down was gambling.
Yakup Kadri Karaosmanoğlu, Kiralık Konak
Revised:
Genç adam, Seniha ile iki, hatta üç kadının bir arada idaresini o kadar müşkül bulmuyordu; belini asıl büken şey, kumardı.
Since it does not have an emphatic sense, the adverbial aralarında (among them) is also rather redundant in the sentence below:
aralarında konuştukları ⟶ konuştukları
Bütün bu zaman boyunca Şevket ile Orhan'ın yukarıda aralarında konuştuklarını işitebiliyordum.
All the while I could hear Shevket and Orhan chattering upstairs.
Orhan Pamuk, Benim Adım Kırmızı
Revised:
Bütün bu zaman boyunca Şevket ile Orhan'ın yukarıda konuştuklarını işitebiliyordum.
🚩 However, in other sentences, the use of such an adverbial may be necessary, as illustrated by the sentence below, where the verbal clause konuştukları İhsan would not make much sense without the adverbial beraber (together):
beraber konuştukları ⟶ beraber konuştukları
“Dünya gömlek değiştireceği zaman hadiseler sakınılmaz olur.” Albert Sorel’in bu cümlesini, son yılların vaziyetini daima beraber konuştukları İhsan sık sık tekrarlardı.
“When the world is about to slough its skin, mayhem is inevitable.” İhsan, with whom he always discussed current events, would often repeat this quote by Albert Sorel.
Ahmed Hamdi Tanpınar, Huzur
👉 Some duplications in meaning, whether tautologically or pleonastically, occur syntactically/grammatically due to the structure of a given language and are inevitable, and therefore acceptable. To ensure mutual understanding between speakers who are never exactly the same in their ways of communication, languages have developed into a means of communication characterized by a great degree of grammatical redundancy.
Commonplace Tautologies and Pleonasms
We use redundant expressions every day, in speech and writing, and there are numerous redundant yet time-honored, and acceptable, phrases in both English and Turkish, including pleonastic modifications and tautological duplications. Some duplicated linguistic forms and redundant modifiers have became lexicalized as part of the language’s idiom.
Languages inherit and borrow numerous words from other languages during the periods of intense cross-cultural interactions, retaining some of them as duplicates, often synonymous and repetitive. To prevent potential confusion that may be caused by a newly borrowed word/phrase, whether it is a common or a specialized expression, language users duplicate the loanword by coupling it with the native equivalent (or near-equivalent). Duplication of meaning can thus be employed as an “insurance” of sorts against any potential misunderstanding. Linguists call such duplicated pairings binominals, or doublets.
In English, such doublets may combine native Old English words and words of the Latin and French origins, for example:
final (French) and conclusive (Latin) | new (Old English) and novel (French) |
fit (Old English) and proper (French) | save (French) and except (Latin) |
Turkish, too, borrowed extensively from French, in addition to Arabic, Persian, and other contact languages, with some examples provided below:
müsait (Arabic) ve elverişli (Turkish) appropriate, fitting, suitable | fakir (Arabic) ve yoksul (Turkish) poor, impoverished |
merhamet (Arabic) ve acıma (Turkish) mercy, compassion | hürmet (Arabic) ve saygı (Turkish) respect, reverence |
In addition to such binominals (or twin nouns), duplications in meaning can occur with the addition of a qualifying nominal, as in the previously mentioned face mask, for example, where the qualifying Old French face (‘face’) is added to duplicate the Medieval French masque, meaning ‘false face’, resulting in the tautological “false facial face”.
There are plenty of redundancies in legalese, including many lexicalized (irreversible) binomials (or legal doublets) consisting of synonyms or near synonyms, such as the well-known law and order, terms and conditions, cease and desist, by and between, for all intents and purposes, for and on behalf of, or null and void. Some legal binomials can be found in Turkish as well (see below):
teşekkür ve şükran thanks and gratitude | yayın ve ilan promulgation | koşul ve şart terms and conditions |
In addition to the manipulative tactics by the marketing and advertising industries using the emphatic force of repetitions to stir up emotional feedback from consumers, other industries, such as journalese, corporatese, officialese, and legalese, where the form of expression may trumple its meaning may, too, be “guilty” of repetitiveness:
Get a FREE GIFT with your qualifying order! Uygun siparişinizle ÜCRETSİZ HEDİYE kazanın! | Bringing New Innovations to Your Enterprise! İşletmenize Yeni Yenilikler Getiriyoruz! |
You’re not limited to only what you could do before. Yalnızca daha önce yapabildiklerinizle sınırlı değilsiniz. | They applied again with another product. Başka bir ürünle tekrar başvurdular. |
Many redundant phrases have become lexicalized. Other redundancies may appear idiomatic, but they are not. For example, the English and Turkish expressions below are technically redundant, with the redundant constituents shown greyed out. Some are subtler than others or too established to ring any redundancy bells. What's fascinating about them, however, is the almost perfect bilingual matching of the phrases, which tells me that these are, indeed, semantic redundancies, that the duplication occurs at the level of meaning, and that some logical fallacies may be universal:
many different ways birçok farklı yol | the usual habits olağan alışkanlıklar | they are both the same onların her ikisi de aynıdır |
the past history geçmiş tarihi | the past experiences geçmiş deneyimleri | as it has been previously found daha önce de belirtildiği gibi |
the actual fact asıl gerçek | a short summary kısa bir özet | to summarize briefly kısaca özetlemek gerekirse |
in close proximity yakın mesafede | more preferable daha çok tercih edilir | arrived together with ile birlikte geldi |
a total sum toplam tutar | a specific example belirli bir örnek | they are both the same onların her ikisi de aynıdır |
a terrible tragedy korkunç bir trajedi | a sad misfortune üzücü bir talihsizlik | for the next discussion later on daha sonraki tartışma için |
cameo appearance cameo görünümü | evening sunset akşam gün batımı | morning sunrise sabah gün doğumu |
cash money nakit para | during the period dönem boyunca | for the duration of one hour bir saat süresince |
green in color yeşil renkli | grouped together birlikte gruplanmış | exact duplicate tam kopya |
small in size küçük boyutlu | an armed gunman silahlı tetikçi | a new recruit yeni acemi |
bouquet of flowers çiçek buketi | annual anniversary yıllık yıldönümü | advance warning önceden uyarı |
all-time record tüm zamanların rekorunu | local residents yerel sakinler | natural instinct doğal içgüdü |
serious danger ciddi tehlike | sudden impulse ani dürtü | frozen ice dondurulmuş buz |
cacophony of sound ses kakofonisi | future plans gelecek planları | final ultimatum son ültimatom |
The phrases above are well-tolerated in conversations and informal, emphatic writing, or just tolerated by users and consumers. They are certainly fine in the emphatic context or in the register with the expressiveness turned up a notch.
Grammatical (Syntactical) Redundancies
In conversations, occasional redundancies are easily forgiven as common collocations in speech or as part of emphatic, emotional exchanges. It is in writing that we must be careful to avoid being repetitive or redundant, even though a certain amount of redundancy is built into languages, and some repetitiveness is syntactically warranted.
Take the grammatical number, for instance. In grammar, only two numbers exist: one (=1) and non-one (≠1), which are presented as the grammatical categories of singular and plural, respectively. For countable entities, if the count is 1 (=1), the noun is grammatically singular; if the count is not 1 (≠1), the noun is grammatically plural. While the singular form is equivalent to the noun in its basic form (e.g., sun, apple, reply), the plural form is formed with the addition of the suffix -(e)s to the basic form of the noun (e.g., suns, apples, replies). For example, the singular forms are 1 sun, 1 apple, 1 reply. But the plural forms are 2 suns, 3 apples, 4 replies, including any count that is less than 1, such as “zero” (0), which agrees with a plural noun (if countable), e.g., they've received 0 replies. In other words, plural counts in English are expressed with two markers of the same thing: a plural numeral (≠1) and the plural suffix -s, which, technically speaking, is redundant. The Turkish language avoids such redundancy by not indicating the plurality of items when they are combined with a numeral, as in 1 elma, 2 elma, or 0 elma.
On the other hand, negation in Turkish is allowed to be redundant in double negative expressions. For example, in the sentences below, Turkish emphatically, and redundantly, uses two negation constructions, while English avoids such redundancy:
Hiçbir şeyin denize atılması doğru değil. It isn’t right to throw anything into the sea. (lit. It isn’t right to throw nothing into the sea.) | Umarım, ne kadar zor olduğunu asla öğrenmezsin. I hope you never find out how hard it is. (lit. I hope you don’t never find out how hard it is.) |
The existence and acceptance of some pleonastic constructs in both English and Turkish can be explained by the history and the structure of the languages. For example, because the following verbs are transitive (require objects), these repetitive expressions are not frown upon:
to sing a song | to live a life | to dance a dance | to drink a drink |
yemek yemek to eat | duygu duymak to feel | oyun oynamak to play | yazı yazmak to write |
soru sormak to ask | tutanak tutmak to take minutes | (bir) süre sürmek to last | sonunda sona ermek to finally end |
For the same reason, the seemingly pleonastic fare kapanı gibi kapanan below is not considered a stylistic usage error in Turkish:
Bu, beyaz gergin tenli, pembe yanaklı, fare kapanı gibi sımsıkı kapanan ince dudaklı, küçük kara gözlü bir kızcağızdı.
This was a pale girl, with rosy cheeks, thin lips that closed tightly like a mousetrap, and small black eyes.
Halide Edib Adıvar, Sinekli Bakkal
Furthermore, because a number of Turkish verbs are used as common bases for numerous verbal compounds and verbal phrases, such as et- (do), yap- (do), çık- (come out, exit), or gir- (come on, enter), such phrases and compounds are differentiated by the objects and adverbials they are combined with. Some adverbials, however, may duplicate the basic meaning of these verbs, such as dışarı (out) and içeri (in) when used with çık- and gir- respectively. Nevertheless, they are not considered redundant, since they help differentiate between the verb phrases using the same verb bases:
dışarı çıkmak to go out (lit. to exit out) | içeri girmek to come in (lit. to enter in) |
If, however, we add one more adverbial to the verb phrases above, the adverbials dışarı (out) and içeri (in) become redundant:
İşe gitmek üzere evden dışarı çıktı. İşe gitmek üzere evden çıktı. He left home to go to work. | Oya, kapıyı iterek açtı ve odama içeri girdi. Oya, kapıyı iterek açtı ve odama girdi. Oya pushed open the door and entered. |
Comments